Teaching for conceptual change in elementary and secondary science methods courses

1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Marion ◽  
Peter W. Hewson ◽  
B. Robert Tabachnick ◽  
Kathryn B. Blomker
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trina Kilty ◽  
Andrea Burrows

The purpose of this study was to describe how US secondary science preservice teachers, or those preparing to teach middle and high school science, at one university, perceive engineering and teaching engineering within an epistemological framework of required domain components pre- and post-instruction (intervention) as well as over three cohort years. Their perceptions reveal relevant prior beliefs helpful for designing instruction to address an external need to prepare secondary science teachers to teach disciplinary content ideas, cross-cutting concepts, and science and engineering practices to meet the Next Generation Science Standards. Questionnaires administered pre- and post-instruction (intervention), as well as over three years, asked participants to decide whether various scenarios qualified as engineering and then to provide reasoning. Intervention instruction included whole-class discussions of engineering design practices. The responses to the questionnaire were analyzed for thematic content. The results indicate that the secondary science preservice teachers (n = 43) have a novice understanding of engineering and teaching engineering. They gain an emerging understanding during the secondary science methods courses, consistent in all three years with expanding perspectives from narrow discipline views. As their perceptions are refined, however, there are risks of oversimplification, which may lead to forming misconceptions. The recommendations for designing instruction such as secondary science methods courses and early career professional development include creating opportunities for preservice and early career teachers to explore and challenge their perceptions of engineering design practices integrated within science and engineering practices.


Author(s):  
Kate Popejoy ◽  
Drew Polly

These two cases address issues related to using technology as a tool to develop pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics and science methods courses. The chapter assumes the following scenario and overarching case study question: You and your colleagues are the course instructors of a mathematics and a science methods course. Your pre-service teachers typically lack content knowledge in mathematics and science. Further, you must also address pedagogies and how to use technology as a tool to support student learning of mathematics and science concepts. What activities can you create to simultaneously develop knowledge of content, pedagogies and how to teach with technology?


1972 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Heimler ◽  
James Cunningham

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Colburn ◽  
John W. Tillotson

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Moore Mensah ◽  
Julie C. Brown ◽  
Preethi Titu ◽  
Paula Rozowa ◽  
Ramya Sivaraj ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document